欢迎访问《安徽农学通报》官方网站,今天是
资源·环境·植保

不同药剂、药械对小麦赤霉病防效的影响

  • 王建武
展开
  • 广德市农业技术服务中心,安徽广德 242200
王建武(1976—),男,安徽广德人,农艺师,从事农业技术推广工作。

收稿日期: 2024-04-13

  网络出版日期: 2024-08-27

Effects of different medications and application equipment on the control efficacy of wheat scab

  • WANG Jianwu
Expand
  • Guangde Agricultural Technology Service Center, Guangde 242200, China

Received date: 2024-04-13

  Online published: 2024-08-27

摘要

为筛选高效安全、防效优异的化学药剂及施药方式,在赤霉病防治关键时期,选择市面上常用的小麦赤霉病防治药剂,采用两种施药方式开展小麦赤霉病防效对比试验。结果表明,在防治药剂选择上,可选用20%氟唑菌酰羟胺SC 750 mL/hm2+25%丙环唑EC 600 mL/hm2、40%丙硫菌唑·戊唑醇SC 600 mL/hm2、30%丙硫菌唑OF 900 mL/hm2+43%戊唑醇SC 600 mL/hm2、30%肟菌·戊唑醇SC 600 mL/hm2或70%甲基硫菌灵WP 1 500 g/hm2中的任意一种进行防治。在施药器械选择上,单论施药效果时,采用背负式电动喷雾器的施药效果优于多旋翼植保无人机施药;而考虑人工成本、作业效率和防治时效等多方面因素,应依据自身实际情况酌情选择。本研究为科学防控小麦赤霉病提供参考。

本文引用格式

王建武 . 不同药剂、药械对小麦赤霉病防效的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2024 , 30(16) : 84 -87 . DOI: 10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2024.16.020

Abstract

In order to screen for highly effective, safe, and excellent chemical agents and application methods, during the critical period for the control of scab, commonly used wheat scab control agents were selected from the market, and a comparative trial of wheat scab control efficacy was conducted using two application methods. The results showed that for the selection of control agents, any one of the following could be used: 20% fluxapyroxad SC 750 mL/hm2+ 25% propiconazole EC 600 mL/hm2, 40% prothioconazole·tebuconazole SC 600 mL/hm2, 30% prothioconazole OF 900 mL/hm2+43% tebuconazole SC 600 mL/hm2, 30% dimethomorph·tebuconazole SC 600 mL/hm2, or 70% thiophanate-methyl WP 1 500 g/hm2. In terms of application equipment, when considering only the application effect, the efficacy of using a knapsack electric sprayer was superior to that of using a multi-rotor plant protection drone. However, taking into account factors such as labor, operational efficiency, and timing of control, appropriate method could be choosed based on its actual circumstances. The purpose was to provide a reference for the scientific prevention and control of wheat scab.

参考文献

[1] 吴海霞,张杰峰,崔家华,等. 航空植保专用药剂对小麦赤霉病的防治效果研究[J]. 安徽农学通报,2020,26(9):101-102,114.
[2] 王连生. 小麦赤霉病发生规律及防治措施[J].种业导刊,2020(3):32-33.
[3] 张永丹. 河南省上蔡县小麦赤霉病流行特点、影响因素及防控措施[J].乡村科技,2024,15(2):79-81.
[4] 邰艳利,赵小宁,许烨,等. 不同药剂及不同施药次数对小麦赤霉病的防效试验[J]. 安徽农学通报,2016,22(14):86-87.
[5] 苏勇宏,马晓静.植保无人机在小麦病虫害防治中的应用[J].农业工程技术,2023,43(17):56-57.
[6] 张聪合,贺亚红,刘珠珠.植保无人机喷施甲基二磺隆对节节麦的田间防效及对小麦的安全性评价[J].基层农技推广,2022,10(3):19-21.
[7] 卢小平,肖冬芽,甘贱根,等. 4种施药器械对水稻基部病虫害的防效比较及经济效益分析[J]. 江西农业学报,2018,30(5):61-64.
[8] 陈宏州,韩凯,杨红福,等. 不同杀菌剂在麦穗中的消解动态及对小麦赤霉病防效评估[J]. 麦类作物学报,2022,42(4):504-511.
[9] 林宛玟. 2种叶菌唑制剂对小麦赤霉病的田间防效及其在小麦上的残留行为[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学,2022.
[10] 龚卫良,殷茵,陆彦,等. 不同药剂对桃树流胶病的防治效果试验[J]. 上海农业科技,2021(5):117-118.
[11] 单丽丽,易红娟. 多种药剂防治结球甘蓝菌核病效果比较试验[J]. 上海农业科技,2022(4):126-127.
[12] 周金鑫,吴佳文,吴达粉,等. 小麦叶部锈病与白粉病防治药剂的筛选[J]. 大麦与谷类科学,2021(6):39-43.
[13] 李苏. 安徽宿州市植保无人机在小麦赤霉病防治中的应用效果[J].农业工程技术,2024,44(7):33-34.
文章导航

/