1 材料与方法
1.1 试验材料
1.2 试验处理
表1 不同LEDs光质的主要技术参数 |
| 光处理 | 光谱 | 峰值/nm | 半波宽/nm | 光照强度/[μmol/(m2·s)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 荧光灯 | 380~760 | — | 45 |
| B | 蓝光 | 460 | 15 | 45 |
| R | 红光 | 660 | 15 | 45 |
| Y | 黄光 | 590 | 15 | 45 |
| G | 绿光 | 530 | 15 | 45 |
| FR | 远红光 | 735 | 15 | 45 |
安徽农学通报 >
2025 , Vol. 31 >Issue 1: 39 - 43
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2025.01.009
不同LEDs光质对黄秋葵组培苗生理特性的影响
|
李慧敏(1981—),女,山东金乡人,博士,副教授,从事园艺作物栽培生理与设施环境调控研究。 |
Copy editor: 吴思文
收稿日期: 2024-08-16
网络出版日期: 2025-01-15
基金资助
江苏省高校“青蓝工程”项目“中青年学术带头人”
江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目资助(2021SJA1488)
江苏省科技副总项目(FZ20221208)
教育部供需对接就业育人项目(20230100151)
苏州农业职业技术学院横向课题“农业园区生产管理系统研发”
Effects of different LEDs light quality on physiological characteristics of Abelmoschus esculentus tissue culture seedlings
Received date: 2024-08-16
Online published: 2025-01-15
为筛选适合黄秋葵组培苗的最优光质,以黄秋葵品种五福为试验材料,采用单因素随机区组设计试验,将其顶芽外植体(1.5 cm)接种到1/2 MS基本培养基上,分别转入荧光灯(CK)、蓝光(B)、红光(R)、黄(Y)、绿(G)和远红光(FR)下进行光照射处理,测定其鲜样质量、干样质量,根系活力,叶绿素a等光合色素含量,超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)等抗氧化酶活性,以及蔗糖等碳水化合物含量。结果表明,各光质处理下,黄秋葵组培苗的鲜样质量和干样质量变化趋势较一致,以B处理最大,分别为2.54 g和0.46 mg;B处理下幼苗的根系活力最强;B处理的组培苗叶绿素a、叶绿素b、叶绿素总量和类胡萝卜素含量均最高,分别为1.09、0.48、1.47和0.38 mg/g,CK处理下叶绿素a/b含量较高;叶片中SOD和过氧化物酶(POD)的活性在B处理下最大,分别为362.75和189.69 U/(g·min);叶片中蔗糖、淀粉、可溶性糖和可溶性总糖含量以R处理最高。综上,单色蓝光处理能有效提高黄秋葵鲜样质量、干样质量、根系活力和叶片中光合色素的含量,单色红光和单色蓝光处理均可促进叶片中蔗糖等碳水化合物的积累。因此,可采用单色蓝光作为黄秋葵离体培养的单色光质。本研究为黄秋葵离体快繁中光质的利用提供参考。
李慧敏 . 不同LEDs光质对黄秋葵组培苗生理特性的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2025 , 31(1) : 39 -43 . DOI: 10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2025.01.009
To select the optimal light quality suitable for tissue culture seedlings of Abelmoschus esculentus, Wufu variety was used as experimental material, and a single factor randomized block design experiment was carried out. The terminal bud explants (1.5 cm) were inoculated on 1/2 MS basic medium. Under fluorescent (CK), blue (B), red (R), yellow (Y), green (G) and far red (FR) light irradiation, fresh sample weight, dry sample weight, root activity, photosynthetic pigment content such as chlorophyll a, antioxidant enzyme activity such as SOD and carbohydrate content such as sucrose were determined. The results showed that under each light quality treatment, the change trend of fresh weight and dry weight was consistent, and B treatment was the highest, which were 2.54 g and 0.46 mg, respectively. The root activity of seedlings under B treatment was the highest. The chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents of tissue culture seedlings treated with B were the highest, which were 1.09, 0.48, 1.47, and 0.38 mg/g, respectively, and the chlorophyll a/b contents under CK treatment were higher. The activities of SOD and POD in leaves were the highest under B treatment, which were 362.75 and 189.69 U/ (g·min), respectively. The contents of sucrose, starch, soluble sugar, and total soluble sugar in leaves were the highest under R treatment. In conclusion, monochrome blue light treatment can effectively improve the quality of fresh samples, dry samples, root activity, and photosynthetic pigment content in leaves; both monochrome red and blue light treatment can promote the accumulation of carbohydrates such as sucrose in leaves. Therefore, the monochromatic blue light can be used as the monochromatic light quality in vitro culture of Abelmoschus esculentus. This study provides references for the utilization of light in the rapid propagation of Abelmoschus esculentus in vitro.
表1 不同LEDs光质的主要技术参数 |
| 光处理 | 光谱 | 峰值/nm | 半波宽/nm | 光照强度/[μmol/(m2·s)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 荧光灯 | 380~760 | — | 45 |
| B | 蓝光 | 460 | 15 | 45 |
| R | 红光 | 660 | 15 | 45 |
| Y | 黄光 | 590 | 15 | 45 |
| G | 绿光 | 530 | 15 | 45 |
| FR | 远红光 | 735 | 15 | 45 |
| 1 |
王旭,韩春乐,周亚楠,等. 黄秋葵查尔酮合成酶基因AeCHS的克隆与表达分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2014,15(3):561-567.
|
| 2 |
高玲,刘迪发,徐丽. 黄秋葵研究进展与前景[J]. 热带农业科学,2014,34(11):22-29.
|
| 3 |
苏俊,刘昳雯,杨凡,等. 不同光质对烟草组培苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2014,34(6):1206-1212.
|
| 4 |
管道平,杨其长,刘文科,等. 植物光自养微繁技术研究进展[J]. 园艺学报,2006,33(3):680-686.
|
| 5 |
李茹,李枝林,商正蕊,等. 不同LED光质对铁皮石斛瓶内开花的影响[J]. 南方农业学报,2019,50(7):1550-1556.
|
| 6 |
冼康华,苏江,黄宁珍,等. 光调控对金线莲生长发育的影响[J]. 广西科学院学报,2019,35(1):36-44.
|
| 7 |
杨贞,张永春,王艺程,等. LED光质对彩色马蹄莲组培苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 上海农业学报,2022,38(1):27-32.
|
| 8 |
李合生. 现代植物生理学[M]. 3版. 北京:高等教育出版社,2012.
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
李慧敏. 不同LEDs复合光质对秋葵组培苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2016,36(5):996-1003.
|
| 11 |
杨俊杰,仇明月,郑涛,等. LED光质对香蕉组培苗生长的影响[J]. 福建热作科技,2023,48(3):1-3.
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
雒佳铭,张宇阳,邱明,等. LED蓝光对受旱脱毒马铃薯植株生长的影响[J]. 照明工程学报,2020,31(5):1-4,38.
|
| 14 |
郝俊江,陈向东,兰进. 光质对灵芝生长及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 中草药,2011,42(12):2529-2534.
|
| 15 |
王立华,陈向东,王秋颖,等. LED光源的不同光质对灵芝菌丝体生长及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 中国中药杂志,2011,36(18):2471-2474.
|
| 16 |
王丹,杨爱宽,李光宏,等. LED光质对碧玉兰×独占春组培苗生理生化影响[J]. 北方园艺,2014,(16):61-66.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |