安徽农学通报 >
2026 , Vol. 32 >Issue 10: 135 - 137
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2026.10.036
曹县江海村乡村治理实践与优化路径
|
王成斌(1970—),男,山东曹县人,高级农艺师,从事农村合作组织管理工作。 |
收稿日期: 2025-10-14
网络出版日期: 2026-05-28
Practice and optimization path of rural governance in Jianghai Village, Caoxian
Received date: 2025-10-14
Online published: 2026-05-28
本文立足乡村全面振兴视角,以山东省曹县青岗集镇江海村为研究案例,系统分析该村乡村治理的现状,结合实际提出针对性优化路径。当前,研究对象在主体协同、治理手段、治理维度及保障体系4个方面仍有提升空间,具体表现为村民参与、社会力量联动、数字化应用、长效保障等相关环节有待完善。基于此,针对性构建完善的乡村治理优化路径,通过激活多元主体,完善村民自治机制、引导社会力量参与、深化政企村协同,构建协同共治格局;创新治理手段,推行“诚信+积分制”、搭建数字化治理平台、优化网格化管理,提升治理精准高质效能;统筹治理维度,推动治理与产业发展、乡风文明、生态宜居等深度融合,实现全域协同发展;健全保障机制,完善制度体系、加强基层队伍建设、优化资源配置,夯实治理长效基础。本文为县域层面乡村治理体系完善提供参考。
王成斌 . 曹县江海村乡村治理实践与优化路径[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2026 , 32(10) : 135 -137 . DOI: 10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2026.10.036
From the perspective of comprehensive rural revitalization, this paper took Jianghai Village, Qinggangji Town, Caoxian County, Shandong Province as the research case, systematically analyzed the current situation of rural governance in the village, and put forward targeted optimization paths combined with reality. At present, Research object still had room for improvement in four aspects including subject coordination, governance means, governance dimension and guarantee system, which was embodied in the need to improve relevant links such as villager participation, social force linkage, digital application and long-term guarantee. On this basis, it constructed a sound optimization path for rural governance. By activating multiple subjects, improving the villager autonomy mechanism, guiding the participation of social forces, and deepening the government-enterprise-village coordination, it built a collaborative governance pattern. It innovated governance methods, implemented the “credits + point system”, built a digital governance platform, and optimized grid management to improve the precise and high-quality governance efficiency. It coordinated governance dimensions, promoted the in-depth integration of governance with industrial development, rural civilization, ecological livability and other fields, and realized all-round coordinated development. It improved the guarantee mechanism, perfected the institutional system, strengthened the construction of grassroots teams, optimized resource allocation, and consolidated the long-term foundation of governance. This paper provids a reference for the improvement of the rural governance system at the county level.
| [1] |
王叶. 新质生产力背景下提升河南省乡村治理成效的实践路径探索[J]. 漯河职业技术学院学报,2025,24(5):53-56.
|
| [2] |
李三辉. 党建引领乡村治理“四治融合”的基本逻辑与结构关系[J]. 江苏第二师范学院学报,2025,41(4):59-63.
|
| [3] |
吕鹏,刘学,任雅兰. 数字乡村治理的实施成效、问题挑战与总体思路[J]. 智能社会研究,2025(3):58-79,262.
|
| [4] |
徐超,肖玉洁,宋利林,等. 乡村振兴视域下乡村治理现状与优化路径[J]. 村委主任,2025(13):260-262.
|
| [5] |
于静,孔令利. 乡村振兴背景下乡村治理路径探析[J]. 智慧农业导刊,2025,5(13):76-79.
|
| [6] |
朱咏,李伟达. 乡村振兴进程中基层党建引领乡村治理进路研究[J]. 理论观察,2024(12):29-33.
|
| [7] |
何东. 新时代乡村治理能力提升的问题及对策研究[J]. 乡村科技,2024,15(19):35-40.
|
| [8] |
苏凯. 乡村振兴战略背景下乡村治理效能提升的路径[J]. 农村经济与科技,2023,34(22):118-121.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |