1 材料与方法
1.1 数据来源
1.2 分析方法
2 结果与分析
2.1 黄檗叶绿体基因组的密码子组成
表1 黄檗叶绿体基因密码子相关参数的相关性 |
| 参数 | GC1 | GC2 | GC3 | GCall | ENC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC2 | 0.346* | ||||
| GC3 | 0.268 | 0.081 | |||
| GCall | 0.811** | 0.740** | 0.520** | ||
| ENC | 0.205 | -0.218 | 0.386** | 0.125 | |
| N | -0.124 | -0.267 | 0.195 | -0.143 | 0.151 |
|
Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin >
2025 , Vol. 31 >Issue 8: 75 - 78
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2025.08.018
Analysis of codon usage bias in chloroplast genome of Phellodendron amurense
Received date: 2024-11-22
Online published: 2025-04-28
To explore the codon usage bias and its major influencing factors in the chloroplast genome of Phellodendron amurense, the coding sequences (CDS) of the chloroplast genome of P. amurense were utilized. Fragments shorter than 300 bp, containing stop codons, or repetitive sequences were excluded, ultimately retaining 52 valid sequences. The GC content and effective number of codons (ENC) of these sequences were calculated using Codon W and CUSP software, and the influencing factors of codon preference were further discussed by correlation analysis of codon preference parameters. The findings indicated that the average GC content within the chloroplast genome of P. amurense was 39.34%, with the GC content at the three positions ranked as follows: GC3 (30.32%) < GC2 (40.07%) < GC1 (47.63%). The codon preference parameter correlation analysis revealed a preference for A and U as the third base of the codon, with an average ENC value of 49.13, indicating a weak codon usage bias. Natural selection pressure was identified as the primary factor affecting codon usage bias. Ten optimized codons were identified, which showed a significant preference for the A and U types. This research lays a data foundation and provides a reference for gene engineering and the optimization of codons in the chloroplast genome of P. amurense.
LU Mengyue , ZHOU Mengmeng , YANG Jun , WU Zhenyu , WANG Bowen , ZOU Yu , YANG Hongsheng . Analysis of codon usage bias in chloroplast genome of Phellodendron amurense[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025 , 31(8) : 75 -78 . DOI: 10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2025.08.018
表1 黄檗叶绿体基因密码子相关参数的相关性 |
| 参数 | GC1 | GC2 | GC3 | GCall | ENC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC2 | 0.346* | ||||
| GC3 | 0.268 | 0.081 | |||
| GCall | 0.811** | 0.740** | 0.520** | ||
| ENC | 0.205 | -0.218 | 0.386** | 0.125 | |
| N | -0.124 | -0.267 | 0.195 | -0.143 | 0.151 |
|
| 1 |
吴茜,姜梅,陈海梅,等. 旋覆花、湖北旋覆花和线叶旋覆花的叶绿体基因组比较分析和系统发育研究[J]. 药学学报,2020,55(5):1042-1049.
|
| 2 |
李事超,赵诚贵,姜永成,等.黄芪属物种叶绿体基因组蛋白编码基因密码子偏好性分析[J/OL].草业科学,1-18(2024-11-10)[2025-4-30].
|
| 3 |
何雯杰,黄华枝,张驰,等. 薇甘菊叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 广西林业科学,2024,53(3):329-338.
|
| 4 |
柳燕杰,田旭平,李倩. 美国红梣叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2020,48(15):83-88.
|
| 5 |
刘起麟,李金泽,丁佳渝,等. 蓼属叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析及比较特征[J/OL]. 中国农业科技导报,1-12(2024-11-10)[2025-4-30].
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
黄治昊,周鑫,张孝然,等. 我国大陆黄檗潜在分布区及分布适宜性评价[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(20):7469-7476.
|
| 8 |
高杨,刘铭,张洪文. 珍稀植物黄檗的药用价值及可持续利用[J]. 中国保健营养,2012,22(4):22-24.
|
| 9 |
屈亚亚,辛静,冯发玉,等. 香花枇杷质体基因组序列密码子偏性分析[J]. 西北林学院学报,2021,36(4):138-144,158.
|
| 10 |
李显煌,杨生超,辛雅萱,等. 灯盏花叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2021(3):384-392.
|
| 11 |
秦斗文,徐庭亮,闫京艳,等. 柔毛郁金香叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2023,51(22):41-47.
|
| 12 |
杨秀玲,许春梅,耿晓珊,等.独脚金叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J].分子植物育种,2023,21(12):3889-3897.
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
余志伟,陈垣,郭凤霞,等. 菘蓝叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏好性分析[J]. 草地学报,2024,32(8):2374-2385.
|
| 16 |
李魁印,张海玲,张鸿,等. 荨麻叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 种子,2022,41(2):51-58.
|
| 17 |
赵靖侨,王杰敏,石卫红,等.北沙参叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J/OL].分子植物育种,1-20(2024-11-10)[2025-4-30].
|
| 18 |
尹明华,李文婷,欧阳茜,等.苏丹草叶绿体基因组特征及系统发育分析[J].草业科学,2025,42(1):101-118.
|
| 19 |
王文斌,于欢,邱相坡. 黄芩叶绿体基因组重复序列及密码子偏好性分析[J]. 分子植物育种,2018,16(8):2445-2452.
|
| 20 |
陆奇丰,骆文华.广西秋海棠叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J/OL].分子植物育种,1-20(2024-11-10)[2025-4-30].
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |