Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin >
2025 , Vol. 31 >Issue 20: 78 - 81
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2025.20.018
Factors contributing to outbreaks of Bemisia tabaci and integrated management strategies in Linquan County
Received date: 2024-12-12
Online published: 2025-10-31
Based on the current occurrence status of Bemisia tabaci in Linquan County, Anhui Province, the reasons for its large-scale prevalence in the area were analyzed and integrated control measures were proposed. Since 2019, massive occurrences of B. tabaci have been monitored on vegetables, watermelons, soybeans, and other crops in the study area. The pest completes 10-13 generations per year, with significant generational overlap. Egg-laying begins in mid-to-late March, and the population peaks between July and September. Favorable climatic conditions, extensive cultivation of landscape seedlings, flowers, and vegetables, as well as the pest's strong adaptability, high reproductive capacity, and migratory ability, have collectively contributed to its widespread occurrence. In practice, concentrated control efforts should be carried out between April and May each year. For agricultural control, environmental sanitation measures such as clearing crop residues and utilizing straw for silage can eliminate breeding sites. Physical control methods include placing sticky traps (450–600 traps/hm2) combined with LED plastic cup traps to attract and kill adults, as well as installing 40–60 mesh insect-proof nets to block migration. For biological control, natural enemies such as Encarsia formosa and Orius sauteri can be released, supplemented by the application of bio-pesticides like matrine and Beauveria bassiana. Chemical control can involve targeted application of agents such as cyantraniliprole and nitenpyram. Through the implementation of these measures, effective control of B. tabaci can be achieved. This study provides a reference for the control of B. tabaci in related regions.
GUO Jucheng , LI Ming . Factors contributing to outbreaks of Bemisia tabaci and integrated management strategies in Linquan County[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025 , 31(20) : 78 -81 . DOI: 10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2025.20.018
| [1] |
申晓娜. 烟粉虱入侵种温度适应表观调控机制[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2021.
|
| [2] |
汪怡蓉. B和Q型烟粉虱对辣椒适应性差异研究[D]. 武汉:湖北大学,2019.
|
| [3] |
唐锷,余席茂,肖昌华,等. 6种杀虫剂对湘南地区Q型烟粉虱的药效试验[J]. 蔬菜,2019(12):73-77.
|
| [4] |
郭梦然,黄玉翠,冯雪莹,等. 三种杀虫剂对烟粉虱优势寄生蜂海氏桨角蚜小蜂的安全性评价[J]. 环境昆虫学报,2021,43(3):745-751.
|
| [5] |
柏晶. 两种烟粉虱隐种在江苏的发生及对温度和药剂胁迫响应的比较研究[D]. 扬州:扬州大学,2022.
|
| [6] |
林克剑,吴孔明,魏洪义,等. 温度和湿度对B型烟粉虱发育、存活和生殖的影响[J]. 植物保护学报,2004,31(2):166-172.
|
| [7] |
陈夜江,罗宏伟,黄建,等. 湿度对烟粉虱实验种群的影响[J]. 华东昆虫学报,2001,10(2):76-80.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
王慧,冯丽芳,王君,等. 烟粉虱对LED-塑料杯的趋性规律研究[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,27(4):419-420,435.
|
| [10] |
周福才,杜予州,孙伟,等. 江苏省烟粉虱寄主植物调查及其危害评价[J]. 扬州大学学报,2003,24(1):71-74,78.
|
| [11] |
徐建陶. 化学与生物农药对设施蔬菜烟粉虱和蚜虫生物活性的研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2005.
|
| [12] |
王美娜. 新疆烟粉虱对吡虫啉、噻虫嗪的抗性监测和BA-ELISA检测技术的开发[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2019.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |