Welcome to visit Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin!

Comparison experiment of fresh corn varieties in southern Anhui Province

  • WANG Xianwan ,
  • SONG Tao ,
  • SHI Liuba ,
  • MU Demei
Expand
  • 1Agricultural and Rural Bureau of Guichi District, Chizhou 247100, China;
    2Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Science, Hefei 230001, China

Received date: 2024-05-30

  Online published: 2024-07-30

Abstract

In order to screen of high yield and quality as well as adaptable fresh corn varieties suitable for planting in southern Anhui Province, 16 experimental fresh corn, test varieties, such as Chuangtian and Xiangtiannuo 828 and two control varieties, Yuetian and Fengnuo 2146, were compared and analyzed for indexes in terms of growth period, main agronomic characters,stress resistance and yield in the southern Anhui Province. The results showed that in terms of the entire growth period, the tested varieties had a total growth period of 77-87 days. In terms of variety resistance, Cuimi 90 had average lodging and disease resistance, while Quantian 58 and Kenuo had average disease resistance. In terms of yield, Longpingtian 1502 in the sweet corn group increased by 13.40% compared to the control group, while Ditiannuo , Fengnuo 211, Caitiannuo 1703, Tianfunuo and Dongtiannuo 100 in the glutinous corn group increased by 17.92%, 19.52%, 10.7%, 26.65%, and 17.81% compared to the control group, respectively. These six corn varieties had better comprehensive performance, good agronomic traits, good resistance, and high yield, and were suitable for promotion and planting in southern Anhui Province.

Cite this article

WANG Xianwan , SONG Tao , SHI Liuba , MU Demei . Comparison experiment of fresh corn varieties in southern Anhui Province[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024 , 30(14) : 7 -12 . DOI: 10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2024.14.002

References

[1] RANUM P,PEÑA-ROSAS J P,GARCIA-CASAL M N. Global maize production,utilization,and consumption[J]. Annals of the New York academy of sciences,2014,1312:105-112.
[2] PENG Q Y,SHEN R Q,LI X Q,et al.A twenty-year dataset of high-resolution maize distribution in China[J]. Scientific data,2023,10(1):658.
[3] 许金芳,宋国安,刘佳. 鲜食玉米研究现状与发展对策[J]. 玉米科学,2007,15(6):40-42,46.
[4] 董冰,侯凌鹏,李亮,等. 我国鲜食玉米产业发展的若干思考[J]. 农业科技通讯,2018(9):4-6.
[5] 安林,程乙,罗上轲,等. 鲜食糯玉米营养品质及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 山地农业生物学报,2023,42(5):40-45.
[6] 黄雅珏,周也富,应飞宇,等. 几种鲜食玉米在洱海流域种植的表观品质评价[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2024,29(5):1-14.
[7] ISLAM M S,LIU J A,JIANG L,et al.Folate content in fresh corn:effects of harvest time,storage and cooking methods[J]. Journal of food composition and analysis,2021,103:104123.
[8] SCOTT C E,ELDRIDGE A L.Comparison of carotenoid content in fresh,frozen and canned corn[J]. Journal of food composition and analysis,2005,18(6):551-559.
[9] HONG H T,NETZEL M E,O’HARE T J. Anthocyanin composition and changes during kernel development in purple-pericarp supersweet sweetcorn[J]. Food chemistry,2020,315:126284.
[10] CHEN L R,GUO Y Q,LI X Y,et al.Phenolics and related in vitro functional activities of different varieties of fresh waxy corn:a whole grain[J]. BMC chemistry,2021,15(1):14.
[11] 邹成林,吴永升,黄开健. 广西鲜食玉米品种对比试验研究[J]. 农业与技术,2015,35(3):1-3,32.
[12] 迟景尚. 不同土壤对不同基因型玉米产量的影响研究[J]. 种子科技,2024,42(3):20-22.
[13] 郭书磊,王瑛,魏良明,等. 不同生态条件下玉米产量影响因素分析[J]. 作物杂志,2023(3):205-214.
[14] 华淑惠,邓思盟,车智敏,等. 玉米种植气候条件及气象服务措施分析[J]. 种子科技,2024,42(4):140-142.
[15] 李妍妍,丰光,王亮,等. 郑单958和先玉335在不同区域的产量比较[J]. 中国种业,2009(8):36-37.
[16] 王晓鸣. 玉米病虫害田间手册:病虫害鉴别与抗性鉴定[M]. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2010.
Outlines

/